TurkishBaklavaCompany.com TBC A.S.
Premium Turkish Baklava, exported worldwide with uncompromising quality.

Contracting & Payment Terms: Reducing Risk

In food imports, most “problems” are really unclear responsibility: who pays, who controls documents, when risk transfers, and what happens if quality or timing fails. This guide gives practical contract and payment structures that reduce risk for both sides.

Contract essentials • Payment safety
Contracting & Payment Terms: Reducing Risk — Baklava Academy featured image

Contracting & Payment Terms: Reducing Risk

Baklava Academy • Article 40 • Updated guide for importers, retailers, and hospitality brands.

Key takeaways

  • Align Incoterms + payment + documents so risk transfer and control are clear.
  • Define quality acceptance (specs, COA, inspection rules, claim window) before money moves.
  • Use step-based payments to protect both sides: deposit, pre-shipment approval, final release.
  • Put “what if” clauses in writing: delays, damaged cartons, temperature exposure, customs holds, force majeure.

1) Start with the contract “spine” (the 12 lines that prevent 80% of disputes)

  • Parties + addresses (legal names, tax IDs if applicable)
  • Product definition (SKU, ingredients statement reference, net weight, piece count, nut type/grade where relevant)
  • Packaging specification (inner tray, outer carton strength, palletization, humidity protection)
  • Labeling approval (final artwork sign-off and who owns liability for translations)
  • Lot coding + shelf life (production date format, minimum remaining shelf life at dispatch)
  • Incoterms + named place (e.g., “FOB Mersin Port” or “DAP Buyer Warehouse, City”)
  • Lead time & dispatch window (what triggers “ready” status)
  • Documents included (commercial invoice, packing list, COA per lot, etc.)
  • Payment terms (when, how, bank charges)
  • Inspection & acceptance (who inspects, sampling rules, pass/fail criteria)
  • Claims window (e.g., 48–72 hours for visible damage; X days for lab-based claims)
  • Dispute resolution (governing law, venue/arbitration language)

2) Payment terms (risk profile by option)

No single “best” term—choose based on trust, order size, and replacement feasibility.

A) T/T (wire transfer) — common and simple

  • Deposit + balance before shipment (good for first orders): e.g., 30% deposit / 70% after label + COA approval, before dispatch.
  • Deposit + balance against documents: balance paid after seller shares scanned docs (invoice, packing list, AWB/B/L draft).
  • Milestone payments for large orders: deposit → packaging procurement → production completion → pre-shipment release.

B) L/C (Letter of Credit) — document-driven risk control

  • Useful when order value is high or parties are new.
  • Risk shifts to document compliance: if documents meet L/C terms, bank pays.
  • Keep it practical: fewer document conditions = fewer “discrepancies.”

C) CAD / D/P (Documents Against Payment) — middle ground

  • Buyer pays to receive documents (often via bank). Less complex than L/C.
  • Still depends on logistics and bank timelines—best for repeat trade.

D) Open account — highest seller risk

  • Usually reserved for established relationships with credit checks and history.

3) Incoterms alignment (avoid “who owns the problem?”)

  • EXW: buyer carries most logistics risk early; can be messy for first-time importers.
  • FOB/CFR/CIF: common for sea freight; define the named port clearly.
  • DAP: seller manages freight to destination point; buyer handles import clearance/duties.
  • DDP: seller handles import duties/taxes—only use if seller truly can do this in the buyer’s country.

Tip: Whatever Incoterm you choose, specify insurance responsibility and what evidence is required for a damage claim (photos, carrier report, etc.).

4) Quality & claims: write the rules before the first shipment

  • Specification sheet: ingredients, nut ratio range (if used), piece size tolerance, syrup level, sensory notes.
  • COA: per lot, with methods/units, and acceptance limits shown.
  • Acceptance criteria: what is “pass” vs “commercially acceptable.”
  • Claims window: separate visible damage from quality claims.
  • Evidence package: photos, carton codes, temperature/humidity indicators (if used), lab results (if applicable).

5) Document control (your leverage point)

Many risk controls are simply: don’t release the wrong documents at the wrong time. Agree in writing on which party provides:

  • Commercial invoice + packing list format
  • COA (lot-linked)
  • Transport documents (AWB/B/L drafts and final copies)
  • Any destination-required certificates (buyer should confirm requirements; seller supports issuance where feasible)

Copy/paste: “risk-reducing” contract checklist

  • Incoterm + named place is written clearly (Y/N): ___
  • Payment milestones and triggers are defined (Y/N): ___
  • Packaging spec + label approval step included (Y/N): ___
  • Minimum remaining shelf life at dispatch defined (Y/N): ___
  • COA per lot required + limits shown (Y/N): ___
  • Inspection rules + claim window defined (Y/N): ___
  • Damage/temperature exposure evidence requirements defined (Y/N): ___
  • Delay and force majeure handling defined (Y/N): ___
  • Dispute resolution clause included (Y/N): ___

Related reads: How to Read a COAShipping by Air vs. SeaCustoms Clearance Basics